NPCI-based bank account validation for IEC applications and modifications enables real-time validation; incorrect details block submission or trigger ...
Creation/Invocation of pledge of securities through depository system: standardized pledge forms, notice requirement and invocation notifications to p...
Calendar Spread margin benefit for Single Stock Derivatives suspended on expiry day for expiring contracts; exchanges must implement systems and rule ...
Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
In a second application for regular bail in an SFIO prosecution alleging diversion of cooperative society funds and offences including fraud under the Companies Act, the court considered whether prolonged incarceration and delay in trial justified relaxation of the twin conditions under s.212(6). While acknowledging that such conditions may be diluted where incarceration is unduly prolonged, it held that a successive bail plea must still demonstrate a substantial change in circumstances. Given the gravity of allegations (including large-scale siphoning), absence of substantiation of claimed repayment, and the prior reasoned rejection of bail affirmed by the apex court, no such change was shown; bail was refused and the trial court was directed to expedite the trial. - HC
In a second application for regular bail in an SFIO prosecution alleging diversion of cooperative society funds and offences including fraud under the Companies Act, the court considered whether prolonged incarceration and delay in trial justified relaxation of the twin conditions under s.212(6). While acknowledging that such conditions may be diluted where incarceration is unduly prolonged, it held that a successive bail plea must still demonstrate a substantial change in circumstances. Given the gravity of allegations (including large-scale siphoning), absence of substantiation of claimed repayment, and the prior reasoned rejection of bail affirmed by the apex court, no such change was shown; bail was refused and the trial court was directed to expedite the trial. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
