Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Execution of a subsisting money decree before the tribunal was held to be governed by Order XXI Rule 11 CPC, which confines the executing forum to modalities of execution, including fixation of instalments. Form NCLT-8, as subordinate legislation, cannot enlarge or override the CPC scheme; in any event, Order XXI Rule 11 permits execution even on an oral application, so a separate formal execution application in Form NCLT-8 is not invariably mandatory. An incorrect statutory reference was held not to vitiate execution proceedings when the relief sought is otherwise legally available. Given the rigid regime for money decrees and the requirement of security for stay under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC (read with Section 424(3) of the Companies Act), the appeal was dismissed - NCLAT
Execution of a subsisting money decree before the tribunal was held to be governed by Order XXI Rule 11 CPC, which confines the executing forum to modalities of execution, including fixation of instalments. Form NCLT-8, as subordinate legislation, cannot enlarge or override the CPC scheme; in any event, Order XXI Rule 11 permits execution even on an oral application, so a separate formal execution application in Form NCLT-8 is not invariably mandatory. An incorrect statutory reference was held not to vitiate execution proceedings when the relief sought is otherwise legally available. Given the rigid regime for money decrees and the requirement of security for stay under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC (read with Section 424(3) of the Companies Act), the appeal was dismissed - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
