Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Execution of a subsisting money decree before the tribunal was held to be governed by Order XXI Rule 11 CPC, which confines the executing forum to modalities of execution, including fixation of instalments. Form NCLT-8, as subordinate legislation, cannot enlarge or override the CPC scheme; in any event, Order XXI Rule 11 permits execution even on an oral application, so a separate formal execution application in Form NCLT-8 is not invariably mandatory. An incorrect statutory reference was held not to vitiate execution proceedings when the relief sought is otherwise legally available. Given the rigid regime for money decrees and the requirement of security for stay under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC (read with Section 424(3) of the Companies Act), the appeal was dismissed - NCLAT
Execution of a subsisting money decree before the tribunal was held to be governed by Order XXI Rule 11 CPC, which confines the executing forum to modalities of execution, including fixation of instalments. Form NCLT-8, as subordinate legislation, cannot enlarge or override the CPC scheme; in any event, Order XXI Rule 11 permits execution even on an oral application, so a separate formal execution application in Form NCLT-8 is not invariably mandatory. An incorrect statutory reference was held not to vitiate execution proceedings when the relief sought is otherwise legally available. Given the rigid regime for money decrees and the requirement of security for stay under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC (read with Section 424(3) of the Companies Act), the appeal was dismissed - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
