Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Execution of a subsisting money decree before the tribunal was held to be governed by Order XXI Rule 11 CPC, which confines the executing forum to modalities of execution, including fixation of instalments. Form NCLT-8, as subordinate legislation, cannot enlarge or override the CPC scheme; in any event, Order XXI Rule 11 permits execution even on an oral application, so a separate formal execution application in Form NCLT-8 is not invariably mandatory. An incorrect statutory reference was held not to vitiate execution proceedings when the relief sought is otherwise legally available. Given the rigid regime for money decrees and the requirement of security for stay under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC (read with Section 424(3) of the Companies Act), the appeal was dismissed - NCLAT
Execution of a subsisting money decree before the tribunal was held to be governed by Order XXI Rule 11 CPC, which confines the executing forum to modalities of execution, including fixation of instalments. Form NCLT-8, as subordinate legislation, cannot enlarge or override the CPC scheme; in any event, Order XXI Rule 11 permits execution even on an oral application, so a separate formal execution application in Form NCLT-8 is not invariably mandatory. An incorrect statutory reference was held not to vitiate execution proceedings when the relief sought is otherwise legally available. Given the rigid regime for money decrees and the requirement of security for stay under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC (read with Section 424(3) of the Companies Act), the appeal was dismissed - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
