Co-operative society's mandatory reserve and share capital fixed deposits with banks-interest treated as business income under 80P(2)(a)(iii) deductio...
Income tax reassessment reopening after four years on investigation tip, without s.147 proviso disclosure failure, struck down as borrowed satisfactio...
Where a corporate debtor was sold as a going concern in liquidation, the auction purchaser was held liable for electricity "true-up" charges levied after issuance of the sale certificate, since under the Liquidation Process Regulations the purchaser bears post-sale operational liabilities and "as per law" does not negate such statutory/regulatory dues; reliance on the regulator's order provision to claim absolution was rejected, and the challenge to the levy failed. The appeal challenging observations relating to a contempt petition was held not maintainable because any alleged contempt of the adjudicating authority's order must be examined only by that adjudicating authority, leaving no surviving cause in appeal. - NCLAT
Where a corporate debtor was sold as a going concern in liquidation, the auction purchaser was held liable for electricity "true-up" charges levied after issuance of the sale certificate, since under the Liquidation Process Regulations the purchaser bears post-sale operational liabilities and "as per law" does not negate such statutory/regulatory dues; reliance on the regulator's order provision to claim absolution was rejected, and the challenge to the levy failed. The appeal challenging observations relating to a contempt petition was held not maintainable because any alleged contempt of the adjudicating authority's order must be examined only by that adjudicating authority, leaving no surviving cause in appeal. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.