NPCI-based bank account validation for IEC applications and modifications enables real-time validation; incorrect details block submission or trigger ...
Creation/Invocation of pledge of securities through depository system: standardized pledge forms, notice requirement and invocation notifications to p...
Calendar Spread margin benefit for Single Stock Derivatives suspended on expiry day for expiring contracts; exchanges must implement systems and rule ...
Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Where a corporate debtor was sold as a going concern in liquidation, the auction purchaser was held liable for electricity "true-up" charges levied after issuance of the sale certificate, since under the Liquidation Process Regulations the purchaser bears post-sale operational liabilities and "as per law" does not negate such statutory/regulatory dues; reliance on the regulator's order provision to claim absolution was rejected, and the challenge to the levy failed. The appeal challenging observations relating to a contempt petition was held not maintainable because any alleged contempt of the adjudicating authority's order must be examined only by that adjudicating authority, leaving no surviving cause in appeal. - NCLAT
Where a corporate debtor was sold as a going concern in liquidation, the auction purchaser was held liable for electricity "true-up" charges levied after issuance of the sale certificate, since under the Liquidation Process Regulations the purchaser bears post-sale operational liabilities and "as per law" does not negate such statutory/regulatory dues; reliance on the regulator's order provision to claim absolution was rejected, and the challenge to the levy failed. The appeal challenging observations relating to a contempt petition was held not maintainable because any alleged contempt of the adjudicating authority's order must be examined only by that adjudicating authority, leaving no surviving cause in appeal. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.