Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties...
Where a corporate debtor was sold as a going concern in liquidation, the auction purchaser was held liable for electricity "true-up" charges levied after issuance of the sale certificate, since under the Liquidation Process Regulations the purchaser bears post-sale operational liabilities and "as per law" does not negate such statutory/regulatory dues; reliance on the regulator's order provision to claim absolution was rejected, and the challenge to the levy failed. The appeal challenging observations relating to a contempt petition was held not maintainable because any alleged contempt of the adjudicating authority's order must be examined only by that adjudicating authority, leaving no surviving cause in appeal. - NCLAT
Where a corporate debtor was sold as a going concern in liquidation, the auction purchaser was held liable for electricity "true-up" charges levied after issuance of the sale certificate, since under the Liquidation Process Regulations the purchaser bears post-sale operational liabilities and "as per law" does not negate such statutory/regulatory dues; reliance on the regulator's order provision to claim absolution was rejected, and the challenge to the levy failed. The appeal challenging observations relating to a contempt petition was held not maintainable because any alleged contempt of the adjudicating authority's order must be examined only by that adjudicating authority, leaving no surviving cause in appeal. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
