Imported analyser diagnostic cartridges treated as accessories with analyser system, not standalone diagnostic reagents; extended limitation and penal...
Steel-timber construction shuttering/formwork tariff classification dispute: essential character held steel, classified as shuttering under Heading 73...
Family-linked property purchases using fabricated loan agreements and benami-style arrangements held to be crime proceeds; attachment upheld, appeal d...
Limitation for a Section 9 IBC application based on MSME Council awards was examined, specifically whether issuance of a Section 8 demand notice in 2019 revived limitation for an application filed in 2020. It was held that the 10-day period after service of a Section 8 notice is only a condition precedent to filing and cannot be used to compute or extend limitation. The limitation period is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, requiring filing within three years from when the right to sue accrues, i.e., when the award became final and operative. Since the claim was already time-barred when the Section 8 notice was issued, the application remained barred and the appeal was dismissed - NCLAT
Limitation for a Section 9 IBC application based on MSME Council awards was examined, specifically whether issuance of a Section 8 demand notice in 2019 revived limitation for an application filed in 2020. It was held that the 10-day period after service of a Section 8 notice is only a condition precedent to filing and cannot be used to compute or extend limitation. The limitation period is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, requiring filing within three years from when the right to sue accrues, i.e., when the award became final and operative. Since the claim was already time-barred when the Section 8 notice was issued, the application remained barred and the appeal was dismissed - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
