Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Limitation for a Section 9 IBC application based on MSME Council awards was examined, specifically whether issuance of a Section 8 demand notice in 2019 revived limitation for an application filed in 2020. It was held that the 10-day period after service of a Section 8 notice is only a condition precedent to filing and cannot be used to compute or extend limitation. The limitation period is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, requiring filing within three years from when the right to sue accrues, i.e., when the award became final and operative. Since the claim was already time-barred when the Section 8 notice was issued, the application remained barred and the appeal was dismissed - NCLAT
Limitation for a Section 9 IBC application based on MSME Council awards was examined, specifically whether issuance of a Section 8 demand notice in 2019 revived limitation for an application filed in 2020. It was held that the 10-day period after service of a Section 8 notice is only a condition precedent to filing and cannot be used to compute or extend limitation. The limitation period is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, requiring filing within three years from when the right to sue accrues, i.e., when the award became final and operative. Since the claim was already time-barred when the Section 8 notice was issued, the application remained barred and the appeal was dismissed - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
