Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
Limitation for a Section 9 IBC application based on MSME Council awards was examined, specifically whether issuance of a Section 8 demand notice in 2019 revived limitation for an application filed in 2020. It was held that the 10-day period after service of a Section 8 notice is only a condition precedent to filing and cannot be used to compute or extend limitation. The limitation period is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, requiring filing within three years from when the right to sue accrues, i.e., when the award became final and operative. Since the claim was already time-barred when the Section 8 notice was issued, the application remained barred and the appeal was dismissed - NCLAT
Limitation for a Section 9 IBC application based on MSME Council awards was examined, specifically whether issuance of a Section 8 demand notice in 2019 revived limitation for an application filed in 2020. It was held that the 10-day period after service of a Section 8 notice is only a condition precedent to filing and cannot be used to compute or extend limitation. The limitation period is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, requiring filing within three years from when the right to sue accrues, i.e., when the award became final and operative. Since the claim was already time-barred when the Section 8 notice was issued, the application remained barred and the appeal was dismissed - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
