Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Once a discharge certificate evidencing full and final settlement under s.127 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 read with Rule 9 of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 is issued in Form SVLDRS-4, the department is barred from continuing or completing adjudication on the underlying show cause notice, as the settlement attains finality; any subsequent adjudicatory order is therefore without legal basis and unsustainable. Consequently, the order-in-appeal was set aside and the appeal was allowed. - CESTAT
Once a discharge certificate evidencing full and final settlement under s.127 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 read with Rule 9 of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 is issued in Form SVLDRS-4, the department is barred from continuing or completing adjudication on the underlying show cause notice, as the settlement attains finality; any subsequent adjudicatory order is therefore without legal basis and unsustainable. Consequently, the order-in-appeal was set aside and the appeal was allowed. - CESTAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.