Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Revocation of a customs broker licence and penalties under CBLR, 2018 for alleged breaches of regulations 10(d), 10(e), 10(n) and 10(q) were set aside because the findings rested on unverified and sketchy material despite specific denial of any connection with the impugned exports and exporters. The authorities failed to supply the relevant shipping bills to enable an effective rebuttal, relied on notices sent to an address not shown to be linked to the broker, and did not verify foundational documents establishing any nexus between the broker and the exporters. The impugned order was held to be non-reasoned and unsustainable; the appeal was allowed. - CESTAT
Revocation of a customs broker licence and penalties under CBLR, 2018 for alleged breaches of regulations 10(d), 10(e), 10(n) and 10(q) were set aside because the findings rested on unverified and sketchy material despite specific denial of any connection with the impugned exports and exporters. The authorities failed to supply the relevant shipping bills to enable an effective rebuttal, relied on notices sent to an address not shown to be linked to the broker, and did not verify foundational documents establishing any nexus between the broker and the exporters. The impugned order was held to be non-reasoned and unsustainable; the appeal was allowed. - CESTAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
