Infrastructure facility: energy-efficient public lighting held integral to road projects, qualifying the operator as a developer and eligible for dedu...
Fourth Proviso to Section 153A: extended-period inquiry requires a reasonable, material-based satisfaction that escaped income likely exceeds the thre...
Pending one-time settlement negotiations with a bank consortium did not justify keeping Section 7 IBC proceedings in abeyance, since the settlement was never unconditionally approved by all consortium members and a borrower cannot claim OTS acceptance as a right; with debt and default undisputed, the financial creditor's statutory right to trigger CIRP could not be subordinated to any inter-creditor/consortium arrangement, leading to affirmation of CIRP admission. Consent of other consortium lenders was not a precondition for a single consortium member to file a standalone Section 7 application, so the admission order suffered no illegality and the appeal was dismissed. - NCLAT
Pending one-time settlement negotiations with a bank consortium did not justify keeping Section 7 IBC proceedings in abeyance, since the settlement was never unconditionally approved by all consortium members and a borrower cannot claim OTS acceptance as a right; with debt and default undisputed, the financial creditor's statutory right to trigger CIRP could not be subordinated to any inter-creditor/consortium arrangement, leading to affirmation of CIRP admission. Consent of other consortium lenders was not a precondition for a single consortium member to file a standalone Section 7 application, so the admission order suffered no illegality and the appeal was dismissed. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
