Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Cross country pipeline classification and ITC entitlement: pipelines outside factory treated as immovable, ITC disallowed under Section 17 restriction...
Where service tax liability was admitted and quantified during investigation prior to the SVLDRS cut-off date of 30.06.2019, the authority could not reject the declarant's SVLDRS Form-1 on the ground that the return was filed belatedly or due to a discrepancy between the quantified amount and the figure stated in Form-1. Quantification before the cut-off satisfied the scheme's eligibility requirement, and denial on that basis was erroneous. The rejection endorsement was quashed, and the authority was directed to issue SVLDRS Form-II, enabling further processing under the scheme; the petition was allowed - HC
Where service tax liability was admitted and quantified during investigation prior to the SVLDRS cut-off date of 30.06.2019, the authority could not reject the declarant's SVLDRS Form-1 on the ground that the return was filed belatedly or due to a discrepancy between the quantified amount and the figure stated in Form-1. Quantification before the cut-off satisfied the scheme's eligibility requirement, and denial on that basis was erroneous. The rejection endorsement was quashed, and the authority was directed to issue SVLDRS Form-II, enabling further processing under the scheme; the petition was allowed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
