Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
Where service tax liability was admitted and quantified during investigation prior to the SVLDRS cut-off date of 30.06.2019, the authority could not reject the declarant's SVLDRS Form-1 on the ground that the return was filed belatedly or due to a discrepancy between the quantified amount and the figure stated in Form-1. Quantification before the cut-off satisfied the scheme's eligibility requirement, and denial on that basis was erroneous. The rejection endorsement was quashed, and the authority was directed to issue SVLDRS Form-II, enabling further processing under the scheme; the petition was allowed - HC
Where service tax liability was admitted and quantified during investigation prior to the SVLDRS cut-off date of 30.06.2019, the authority could not reject the declarant's SVLDRS Form-1 on the ground that the return was filed belatedly or due to a discrepancy between the quantified amount and the figure stated in Form-1. Quantification before the cut-off satisfied the scheme's eligibility requirement, and denial on that basis was erroneous. The rejection endorsement was quashed, and the authority was directed to issue SVLDRS Form-II, enabling further processing under the scheme; the petition was allowed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
