Reversal of input tax credit in proportion to exempt supply: specificity of show-cause notice required; order set aside, fresh proceedings allowed wit...
Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Confiscation proceedings concerning alleged excess stock of imported electronic goods were challenged on the ground that, although the authority offered offering provisional release, it neither quantified the amount payable nor stipulated any conditions for such release, rendering the option illusory. The forum noted that the seized goods were imported about six years earlier and were likely technologically outdated, requiring a policy-level resolution on provisional release where seizures are based on suspected GST evasion. The matter was directed to be placed before the GST Council for appropriate policy consideration, and the writ petition was disposed of accordingly. - HC
Confiscation proceedings concerning alleged excess stock of imported electronic goods were challenged on the ground that, although the authority offered offering provisional release, it neither quantified the amount payable nor stipulated any conditions for such release, rendering the option illusory. The forum noted that the seized goods were imported about six years earlier and were likely technologically outdated, requiring a policy-level resolution on provisional release where seizures are based on suspected GST evasion. The matter was directed to be placed before the GST Council for appropriate policy consideration, and the writ petition was disposed of accordingly. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
