Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Blocking of the petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger under Rule 86A was held invalid because the authority neither granted a pre-decisional hearing nor recorded independent, cogent "reasons to believe" as mandated by Rule 86A. Reliance merely on enforcement reports amounted to impermissible borrowed satisfaction, and the order contained only vague assertions of ITC from non-existent suppliers and multiple e-way bills without supporting material. For breach of natural justice and non-fulfilment of statutory prerequisites, the blocking order was quashed and the petition was allowed. - HC
Blocking of the petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger under Rule 86A was held invalid because the authority neither granted a pre-decisional hearing nor recorded independent, cogent "reasons to believe" as mandated by Rule 86A. Reliance merely on enforcement reports amounted to impermissible borrowed satisfaction, and the order contained only vague assertions of ITC from non-existent suppliers and multiple e-way bills without supporting material. For breach of natural justice and non-fulfilment of statutory prerequisites, the blocking order was quashed and the petition was allowed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.