Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Penalty under s. 272A(1)(d) for alleged non-compliance with notices issued under s. 142(1) was examined where the notices were only uploaded on the e-filing portal and the assessment was completed ex parte under s. 144. Since there was no evidence of effective service or actual communication of the notices, the assessee's lack of actual knowledge constituted "reasonable cause" for non-compliance, and penalty could not be sustained merely because notices remained on the portal. Consequently, the appellate order affirming the penalty was set aside and the penalty was deleted. - ITAT
Penalty under s. 272A(1)(d) for alleged non-compliance with notices issued under s. 142(1) was examined where the notices were only uploaded on the e-filing portal and the assessment was completed ex parte under s. 144. Since there was no evidence of effective service or actual communication of the notices, the assessee's lack of actual knowledge constituted "reasonable cause" for non-compliance, and penalty could not be sustained merely because notices remained on the portal. Consequently, the appellate order affirming the penalty was set aside and the penalty was deleted. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.