Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under s. 272A(1)(d) for alleged non-compliance with notices issued under s. 142(1) was examined where the notices were only uploaded on the e-filing portal and the assessment was completed ex parte under s. 144. Since there was no evidence of effective service or actual communication of the notices, the assessee's lack of actual knowledge constituted "reasonable cause" for non-compliance, and penalty could not be sustained merely because notices remained on the portal. Consequently, the appellate order affirming the penalty was set aside and the penalty was deleted. - ITAT
Penalty under s. 272A(1)(d) for alleged non-compliance with notices issued under s. 142(1) was examined where the notices were only uploaded on the e-filing portal and the assessment was completed ex parte under s. 144. Since there was no evidence of effective service or actual communication of the notices, the assessee's lack of actual knowledge constituted "reasonable cause" for non-compliance, and penalty could not be sustained merely because notices remained on the portal. Consequently, the appellate order affirming the penalty was set aside and the penalty was deleted. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
