Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6961 to 6980 of 96406 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under s. 272A(1)(d) for alleged non-compliance with notices issued under s. 142(1) was examined where the notices were only uploaded on the e-filing portal and the assessment was completed ex parte under s. 144. Since there was no evidence of effective service or actual communication of the notices, the assessee's lack of actual knowledge constituted "reasonable cause" for non-compliance, and penalty could not be sustained merely because notices remained on the portal. Consequently, the appellate order affirming the penalty was set aside and the penalty was deleted. - ITAT
Penalty under s. 272A(1)(d) for alleged non-compliance with notices issued under s. 142(1) was examined where the notices were only uploaded on the e-filing portal and the assessment was completed ex parte under s. 144. Since there was no evidence of effective service or actual communication of the notices, the assessee's lack of actual knowledge constituted "reasonable cause" for non-compliance, and penalty could not be sustained merely because notices remained on the portal. Consequently, the appellate order affirming the penalty was set aside and the penalty was deleted. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
