Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Shareholders challenged a CIRP admission, raising locus standi and alleging fraudulent initiation by related parties. Interpreting s.61 IBC broadly, "any person aggrieved" includes shareholders affected by the AA's order; the appeal was held maintainable. On merits, the s.7 admission was found mechanical and lacking scrutiny of undisputed related-party links, common management, and AGM rejection of related-party transactions; delayed stock-exchange disclosure under SEBI LODR further supported collusion. The s.7 filing was held a collusive device for an ulterior purpose rather than genuine resolution, warranting intervention. CIRP was set aside, costs of ₹25 lakhs imposed on the financial creditor, and the matter referred to IBBI regarding the RP's conduct. - NCLAT
Shareholders challenged a CIRP admission, raising locus standi and alleging fraudulent initiation by related parties. Interpreting s.61 IBC broadly, "any person aggrieved" includes shareholders affected by the AA's order; the appeal was held maintainable. On merits, the s.7 admission was found mechanical and lacking scrutiny of undisputed related-party links, common management, and AGM rejection of related-party transactions; delayed stock-exchange disclosure under SEBI LODR further supported collusion. The s.7 filing was held a collusive device for an ulterior purpose rather than genuine resolution, warranting intervention. CIRP was set aside, costs of ₹25 lakhs imposed on the financial creditor, and the matter referred to IBBI regarding the RP's conduct. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
