Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
81 to 100 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Disallowance of interest was contested on the ground that short-term borrowings were used for long-term investment and only a limited period of capitalization was warranted. Relying on the audit report evidencing diversion of short-term loans to capital projects already put to use, and noting that capital work-in-progress was undisputed, the appellate authority correctly sustained capitalization of interest only for four months and deleted the balance disallowance; the revenue's challenge was rejected. On transfer pricing for sugar exports, CUP-based benchmarking using FOB-converted prices with an average of NYBOT and Kingsman rates, along with the statutory tolerance range under section 92C(2), was upheld; no interference was warranted. On ferrous exports, contracts were accepted as CUP and adjustment restricted; the revenue's ground failed. - ITAT
Disallowance of interest was contested on the ground that short-term borrowings were used for long-term investment and only a limited period of capitalization was warranted. Relying on the audit report evidencing diversion of short-term loans to capital projects already put to use, and noting that capital work-in-progress was undisputed, the appellate authority correctly sustained capitalization of interest only for four months and deleted the balance disallowance; the revenue's challenge was rejected. On transfer pricing for sugar exports, CUP-based benchmarking using FOB-converted prices with an average of NYBOT and Kingsman rates, along with the statutory tolerance range under section 92C(2), was upheld; no interference was warranted. On ferrous exports, contracts were accepted as CUP and adjustment restricted; the revenue's ground failed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
