Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Interest liability accrued on a soft loan advanced by the State Government under an agreement was disallowed as an unascertained liability under section 37. Applying the mercantile system, interest became payable and had to be provided in the accounts notwithstanding that repayment had not commenced due to non-withdrawal of the full sanctioned amount. Since the loan was admittedly obtained and interest was contractually chargeable, the interest provision constituted an ascertained liability and could not be disallowed under section 37. The deduction for interest so provided was directed to be allowed, and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Interest liability accrued on a soft loan advanced by the State Government under an agreement was disallowed as an unascertained liability under section 37. Applying the mercantile system, interest became payable and had to be provided in the accounts notwithstanding that repayment had not commenced due to non-withdrawal of the full sanctioned amount. Since the loan was admittedly obtained and interest was contractually chargeable, the interest provision constituted an ascertained liability and could not be disallowed under section 37. The deduction for interest so provided was directed to be allowed, and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.