Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Interest liability accrued on a soft loan advanced by the State Government under an agreement was disallowed as an unascertained liability under section 37. Applying the mercantile system, interest became payable and had to be provided in the accounts notwithstanding that repayment had not commenced due to non-withdrawal of the full sanctioned amount. Since the loan was admittedly obtained and interest was contractually chargeable, the interest provision constituted an ascertained liability and could not be disallowed under section 37. The deduction for interest so provided was directed to be allowed, and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Interest liability accrued on a soft loan advanced by the State Government under an agreement was disallowed as an unascertained liability under section 37. Applying the mercantile system, interest became payable and had to be provided in the accounts notwithstanding that repayment had not commenced due to non-withdrawal of the full sanctioned amount. Since the loan was admittedly obtained and interest was contractually chargeable, the interest provision constituted an ascertained liability and could not be disallowed under section 37. The deduction for interest so provided was directed to be allowed, and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.