Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Non-maintenance of pre-trade and post-trade confirmations under the SEBI circular dated 22 March 2018 may attract regulatory or disciplinary action against a stockbroker, but does not per se create civil liability to reimburse a client's trading losses. Where the clients admitted authorising a known third person to execute trades and assumed market risk, they could not later disown those trades by invoking the confirmation requirement; the requirement is material only where trades are proved to be blatantly unauthorised. The arbitral tribunals' award of 50% of F&O losses without any enquiry or evidence of causation and damages, based solely on alleged negligence, conflicted with the fundamental policy of Indian law under the Arbitration Act. The awards were set aside and the petitions were allowed - HC
Non-maintenance of pre-trade and post-trade confirmations under the SEBI circular dated 22 March 2018 may attract regulatory or disciplinary action against a stockbroker, but does not per se create civil liability to reimburse a client's trading losses. Where the clients admitted authorising a known third person to execute trades and assumed market risk, they could not later disown those trades by invoking the confirmation requirement; the requirement is material only where trades are proved to be blatantly unauthorised. The arbitral tribunals' award of 50% of F&O losses without any enquiry or evidence of causation and damages, based solely on alleged negligence, conflicted with the fundamental policy of Indian law under the Arbitration Act. The awards were set aside and the petitions were allowed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
