Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents f...
Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Export Obligation Discharge Certificates for EPCG compliance cannot be questioned by Customs unless DGFT adjudicates and cancels them, so demands quas...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6761 to 6780 of 96408 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Non-maintenance of pre-trade and post-trade confirmations under the SEBI circular dated 22 March 2018 may attract regulatory or disciplinary action against a stockbroker, but does not per se create civil liability to reimburse a client's trading losses. Where the clients admitted authorising a known third person to execute trades and assumed market risk, they could not later disown those trades by invoking the confirmation requirement; the requirement is material only where trades are proved to be blatantly unauthorised. The arbitral tribunals' award of 50% of F&O losses without any enquiry or evidence of causation and damages, based solely on alleged negligence, conflicted with the fundamental policy of Indian law under the Arbitration Act. The awards were set aside and the petitions were allowed - HC
Non-maintenance of pre-trade and post-trade confirmations under the SEBI circular dated 22 March 2018 may attract regulatory or disciplinary action against a stockbroker, but does not per se create civil liability to reimburse a client's trading losses. Where the clients admitted authorising a known third person to execute trades and assumed market risk, they could not later disown those trades by invoking the confirmation requirement; the requirement is material only where trades are proved to be blatantly unauthorised. The arbitral tribunals' award of 50% of F&O losses without any enquiry or evidence of causation and damages, based solely on alleged negligence, conflicted with the fundamental policy of Indian law under the Arbitration Act. The awards were set aside and the petitions were allowed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.