CENVAT credit availability after omission of Rule 12B in textiles confirmed; late addendum to SCN introducing new grounds held time-barred and invalid...
Export of Wheat Flour and related products subject to online allocation, eligibility criteria, non-transferable six-month authorisations and reporting...
Straight-line lease rental accounting change results in penalty quashed where disclosed accounts and bona fide arguable accounting interpretation exis...
The dominant issue was whether rejection of the taxpayer's request relating to payment of GST arrears for 2020-2021, purportedly under Rule 158B(3) and Rule 158(3)(a) of the GST Rules, could stand without affording an effective personal hearing. The authority was directed to reconsider the matter on merits after granting a personal hearing, thereby setting aside the operative effect of the impugned rejection for fresh adjudication. Consequentially, further recovery action pursuant to the garnishee proceedings in Form GST DRC-13 was ordered to remain in abeyance, subject to deposit of an additional specified amount within the stipulated time. - HC
The dominant issue was whether rejection of the taxpayer's request relating to payment of GST arrears for 2020-2021, purportedly under Rule 158B(3) and Rule 158(3)(a) of the GST Rules, could stand without affording an effective personal hearing. The authority was directed to reconsider the matter on merits after granting a personal hearing, thereby setting aside the operative effect of the impugned rejection for fresh adjudication. Consequentially, further recovery action pursuant to the garnishee proceedings in Form GST DRC-13 was ordered to remain in abeyance, subject to deposit of an additional specified amount within the stipulated time. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
