Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
The dominant issue was whether rejection of the taxpayer's request relating to payment of GST arrears for 2020-2021, purportedly under Rule 158B(3) and Rule 158(3)(a) of the GST Rules, could stand without affording an effective personal hearing. The authority was directed to reconsider the matter on merits after granting a personal hearing, thereby setting aside the operative effect of the impugned rejection for fresh adjudication. Consequentially, further recovery action pursuant to the garnishee proceedings in Form GST DRC-13 was ordered to remain in abeyance, subject to deposit of an additional specified amount within the stipulated time. - HC
The dominant issue was whether rejection of the taxpayer's request relating to payment of GST arrears for 2020-2021, purportedly under Rule 158B(3) and Rule 158(3)(a) of the GST Rules, could stand without affording an effective personal hearing. The authority was directed to reconsider the matter on merits after granting a personal hearing, thereby setting aside the operative effect of the impugned rejection for fresh adjudication. Consequentially, further recovery action pursuant to the garnishee proceedings in Form GST DRC-13 was ordered to remain in abeyance, subject to deposit of an additional specified amount within the stipulated time. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
