Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Consideration received for granting non-exclusive broadcasting rights in feature films was examined to determine whether it constituted "royalty" under Explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vi) and Article 12(3) of the applicable treaty. The rights granted were limited to broadcast, with no transfer of copyright or ancillary rights such as editing, modification, deletion, addition, or sublicensing, and the licensor did not part with any copyright interest. On these terms, the payment was held not to be for the use of any copyright and therefore did not fall within the definition of "royalty", resulting in deletion of the addition and allowance of the appeal. - ITAT
Consideration received for granting non-exclusive broadcasting rights in feature films was examined to determine whether it constituted "royalty" under Explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vi) and Article 12(3) of the applicable treaty. The rights granted were limited to broadcast, with no transfer of copyright or ancillary rights such as editing, modification, deletion, addition, or sublicensing, and the licensor did not part with any copyright interest. On these terms, the payment was held not to be for the use of any copyright and therefore did not fall within the definition of "royalty", resulting in deletion of the addition and allowance of the appeal. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
