Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision under s.263 was held unsustainable where the revisional authority assumed jurisdiction on limited show-cause grounds but finally set aside the assessment on additional issues (ICDS/AS-7 compliance, refund verification, stock reconciliation, and purchases from non-filers) without issuing any notice on those new grounds; such expansion beyond the show-cause violates jurisdictional limits, vitiating the revision. On the original show-cause issues, the record showed adequate enquiry on creditor ageing and no demonstrated revenue prejudice, and post-assessment survey material could not retroactively render the completed assessment erroneous. Non-disallowance of delayed employees' PF/ESI contributions was not treated as an error in light of then-prevailing HC law when the assessment was framed. The s.263 order was quashed and the appeal allowed - ITAT
Revision under s.263 was held unsustainable where the revisional authority assumed jurisdiction on limited show-cause grounds but finally set aside the assessment on additional issues (ICDS/AS-7 compliance, refund verification, stock reconciliation, and purchases from non-filers) without issuing any notice on those new grounds; such expansion beyond the show-cause violates jurisdictional limits, vitiating the revision. On the original show-cause issues, the record showed adequate enquiry on creditor ageing and no demonstrated revenue prejudice, and post-assessment survey material could not retroactively render the completed assessment erroneous. Non-disallowance of delayed employees' PF/ESI contributions was not treated as an error in light of then-prevailing HC law when the assessment was framed. The s.263 order was quashed and the appeal allowed - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
