Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Revision under s.263 was held unsustainable where the revisional authority assumed jurisdiction on limited show-cause grounds but finally set aside the assessment on additional issues (ICDS/AS-7 compliance, refund verification, stock reconciliation, and purchases from non-filers) without issuing any notice on those new grounds; such expansion beyond the show-cause violates jurisdictional limits, vitiating the revision. On the original show-cause issues, the record showed adequate enquiry on creditor ageing and no demonstrated revenue prejudice, and post-assessment survey material could not retroactively render the completed assessment erroneous. Non-disallowance of delayed employees' PF/ESI contributions was not treated as an error in light of then-prevailing HC law when the assessment was framed. The s.263 order was quashed and the appeal allowed - ITAT
Revision under s.263 was held unsustainable where the revisional authority assumed jurisdiction on limited show-cause grounds but finally set aside the assessment on additional issues (ICDS/AS-7 compliance, refund verification, stock reconciliation, and purchases from non-filers) without issuing any notice on those new grounds; such expansion beyond the show-cause violates jurisdictional limits, vitiating the revision. On the original show-cause issues, the record showed adequate enquiry on creditor ageing and no demonstrated revenue prejudice, and post-assessment survey material could not retroactively render the completed assessment erroneous. Non-disallowance of delayed employees' PF/ESI contributions was not treated as an error in light of then-prevailing HC law when the assessment was framed. The s.263 order was quashed and the appeal allowed - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
