Admissibility of recorded statements and electronic evidence: CESTAT excludes non compliant statements and email printouts and sets aside revaluation ...
Corporate guarantee invocation in insolvency petition: enforceability upheld, conditional sanction letter not a novation, limitation not barred after ...
Imported diagnostic cartridges for use with an analyser were...
Imported analyser diagnostic cartridges treated as accessories with analyser system, not standalone diagnostic reagents; extended limitation and penalty rejected.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Imported diagnostic cartridges for use with an analyser were held not classifiable as "diagnostic reagents" under CTH 3822 because they do not independently yield results through a chemical reaction; results arise only when used with the analyser, making them parts/accessories principally suitable for use with the instrument under HSN notes. Accordingly, they were classifiable under CTH 9027 as accessories forming an integrated system with the analyser, consistent with judicial guidance on analogous meter/strip imports. On limitation, extended period and penalty were rejected as product description was correctly declared and suppression/misdeclaration was not established. The impugned order and addendum were set aside and the appeal was allowed - CESTAT
Imported diagnostic cartridges for use with an analyser were held not classifiable as "diagnostic reagents" under CTH 3822 because they do not independently yield results through a chemical reaction; results arise only when used with the analyser, making them parts/accessories principally suitable for use with the instrument under HSN notes. Accordingly, they were classifiable under CTH 9027 as accessories forming an integrated system with the analyser, consistent with judicial guidance on analogous meter/strip imports. On limitation, extended period and penalty were rejected as product description was correctly declared and suppression/misdeclaration was not established. The impugned order and addendum were set aside and the appeal was allowed - CESTAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
