Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Challenge to detention/confiscation proceedings under the CGST Act on the ground that no notice under s.129(3) was issued and the authority, without determining penalty under s.129, directly initiated confiscation under s.130 in Forms GST MOV-10 and MOV-11, was not adjudicated on merits in writ jurisdiction. The court directed the aggrieved party to file an appeal before the competent appellate authority, with liberty to raise all grounds taken in the writ, and required the appellate authority to decide the appeal on merits and examine the propriety of invoking MOV-10/MOV-11; if filed within 10 days, disposal was directed within 12 weeks - HC
Challenge to detention/confiscation proceedings under the CGST Act on the ground that no notice under s.129(3) was issued and the authority, without determining penalty under s.129, directly initiated confiscation under s.130 in Forms GST MOV-10 and MOV-11, was not adjudicated on merits in writ jurisdiction. The court directed the aggrieved party to file an appeal before the competent appellate authority, with liberty to raise all grounds taken in the writ, and required the appellate authority to decide the appeal on merits and examine the propriety of invoking MOV-10/MOV-11; if filed within 10 days, disposal was directed within 12 weeks - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
