Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
Revision u/s 263 was held unsustainable because the AO had conducted independent enquiry, recorded third-party statements corroborated by the assessee's personnel, and adopted a plausible view accepting purchases as genuine; the revisional authority failed to specifically demonstrate how the assessment was both erroneous and prejudicial, resting mainly on suspicion and third-party cash withdrawals, so the revision order was set aside. On reassessment, addition for alleged bogus purchases of raw material was deleted as sales (including exports with statutory clearances) were accepted, payments were through banking channels, stock/yield were not doubted, supplier confirmations and documents supported procurement, and the "round-tripping" inference lacked year-specific material; the deletion was upheld against the revenue. - ITAT
Revision u/s 263 was held unsustainable because the AO had conducted independent enquiry, recorded third-party statements corroborated by the assessee's personnel, and adopted a plausible view accepting purchases as genuine; the revisional authority failed to specifically demonstrate how the assessment was both erroneous and prejudicial, resting mainly on suspicion and third-party cash withdrawals, so the revision order was set aside. On reassessment, addition for alleged bogus purchases of raw material was deleted as sales (including exports with statutory clearances) were accepted, payments were through banking channels, stock/yield were not doubted, supplier confirmations and documents supported procurement, and the "round-tripping" inference lacked year-specific material; the deletion was upheld against the revenue. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.