Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents f...
Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Export Obligation Discharge Certificates for EPCG compliance cannot be questioned by Customs unless DGFT adjudicates and cancels them, so demands quas...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6761 to 6780 of 96408 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
TDR expenditure treated as inventory cost was held allowable in the year to which the AO had himself earlier attributed it; having disallowed it as "prior period" in a later year on the footing that it pertained to the earlier year, the revenue could not take a contradictory stand to deny deduction in both years. The reassessment disallowance was therefore directed to be deleted. Penalty under s. 270A on disallowance of Keyman insurance premium was deleted because the issue was debatable and the AO failed to record the requisite finding specifying whether the case involved under-reporting or misreporting. Disallowance of interest under s. 36(1)(iii) on interest-free advances was deleted since interest-free funds exceeded the advances, attracting the presumption that advances were from such funds - ITAT
TDR expenditure treated as inventory cost was held allowable in the year to which the AO had himself earlier attributed it; having disallowed it as "prior period" in a later year on the footing that it pertained to the earlier year, the revenue could not take a contradictory stand to deny deduction in both years. The reassessment disallowance was therefore directed to be deleted. Penalty under s. 270A on disallowance of Keyman insurance premium was deleted because the issue was debatable and the AO failed to record the requisite finding specifying whether the case involved under-reporting or misreporting. Disallowance of interest under s. 36(1)(iii) on interest-free advances was deleted since interest-free funds exceeded the advances, attracting the presumption that advances were from such funds - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
