Condonation of delay in filing GSTR-3B returns and entitlement to Section 62 benefit results in withdrawal of assessments and revocation of attachment...
Penalty for estimation of income and disallowances for tax non-deduction clarified: estimation-based penalties not sustainable; additions without conc...
Reopening under s.147 was upheld as the AO recorded that the assessee had failed to fully and truly disclose material facts necessary for assessment, and the matters forming the basis of reassessment had not been examined in the earlier s.143(3) proceedings; hence, the reassessment was not a mere change of opinion and the jurisdictional condition of "reasons to believe" was satisfied, resulting in rejection of the challenge to reopening. The CIT(A)'s remand for de novo assessment was sustained because the assessment had been framed without reasons due to alleged non-compliance with notices, and the assessee demonstrated illness as cause; the CIT(A) validly exercised powers under s.251(1)(a), leading to dismissal of the appeal ground. - ITAT
Reopening under s.147 was upheld as the AO recorded that the assessee had failed to fully and truly disclose material facts necessary for assessment, and the matters forming the basis of reassessment had not been examined in the earlier s.143(3) proceedings; hence, the reassessment was not a mere change of opinion and the jurisdictional condition of "reasons to believe" was satisfied, resulting in rejection of the challenge to reopening. The CIT(A)'s remand for de novo assessment was sustained because the assessment had been framed without reasons due to alleged non-compliance with notices, and the assessee demonstrated illness as cause; the CIT(A) validly exercised powers under s.251(1)(a), leading to dismissal of the appeal ground. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
