Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The dominant issue was whether leave encashment received by the assessee qualified for full exemption under s.10(10AA) by treating the assessee as a Central Government employee, or whether the exemption was capped at ₹3,00,000. Relying on a prior co-ordinate bench decision holding that employees of such institutions are not Central Government servants for s.10(10AA), the Tribunal upheld the restriction of exemption and rejected the claim for higher relief; the assessee's appeal was dismissed. - ITAT
The dominant issue was whether leave encashment received by the assessee qualified for full exemption under s.10(10AA) by treating the assessee as a Central Government employee, or whether the exemption was capped at ₹3,00,000. Relying on a prior co-ordinate bench decision holding that employees of such institutions are not Central Government servants for s.10(10AA), the Tribunal upheld the restriction of exemption and rejected the claim for higher relief; the assessee's appeal was dismissed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
