Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
The dominant issue was whether leave encashment received by the assessee qualified for full exemption under s.10(10AA) by treating the assessee as a Central Government employee, or whether the exemption was capped at ₹3,00,000. Relying on a prior co-ordinate bench decision holding that employees of such institutions are not Central Government servants for s.10(10AA), the Tribunal upheld the restriction of exemption and rejected the claim for higher relief; the assessee's appeal was dismissed. - ITAT
The dominant issue was whether leave encashment received by the assessee qualified for full exemption under s.10(10AA) by treating the assessee as a Central Government employee, or whether the exemption was capped at ₹3,00,000. Relying on a prior co-ordinate bench decision holding that employees of such institutions are not Central Government servants for s.10(10AA), the Tribunal upheld the restriction of exemption and rejected the claim for higher relief; the assessee's appeal was dismissed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
