Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents f...
Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Export Obligation Discharge Certificates for EPCG compliance cannot be questioned by Customs unless DGFT adjudicates and cancels them, so demands quas...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6761 to 6780 of 96408 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reassessment under ss.147/148 was held void ab initio as the AO recorded "reasons" merely on Investigation Wing information indicating a possibility of similar transactions, without any seized material, independent enquiry, or application of mind, amounting to borrowed satisfaction and lack of jurisdiction. Given the year was unabated and no incriminating material was forwarded, the AO ought not to have assumed jurisdiction under s.147, and the failure to follow the due statutory route (including s.153C where applicable) vitiated initiation itself. Since confirmations had already been furnished during s.142(1) proceedings, rejection/forensic testing at appellate stage could not cure the foundational defect. Appeal allowed on jurisdiction, without examining merits. - ITAT
Reassessment under ss.147/148 was held void ab initio as the AO recorded "reasons" merely on Investigation Wing information indicating a possibility of similar transactions, without any seized material, independent enquiry, or application of mind, amounting to borrowed satisfaction and lack of jurisdiction. Given the year was unabated and no incriminating material was forwarded, the AO ought not to have assumed jurisdiction under s.147, and the failure to follow the due statutory route (including s.153C where applicable) vitiated initiation itself. Since confirmations had already been furnished during s.142(1) proceedings, rejection/forensic testing at appellate stage could not cure the foundational defect. Appeal allowed on jurisdiction, without examining merits. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
