Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Reassessment under ss.147/148 was held void ab initio as the AO recorded "reasons" merely on Investigation Wing information indicating a possibility of similar transactions, without any seized material, independent enquiry, or application of mind, amounting to borrowed satisfaction and lack of jurisdiction. Given the year was unabated and no incriminating material was forwarded, the AO ought not to have assumed jurisdiction under s.147, and the failure to follow the due statutory route (including s.153C where applicable) vitiated initiation itself. Since confirmations had already been furnished during s.142(1) proceedings, rejection/forensic testing at appellate stage could not cure the foundational defect. Appeal allowed on jurisdiction, without examining merits. - ITAT
Reassessment under ss.147/148 was held void ab initio as the AO recorded "reasons" merely on Investigation Wing information indicating a possibility of similar transactions, without any seized material, independent enquiry, or application of mind, amounting to borrowed satisfaction and lack of jurisdiction. Given the year was unabated and no incriminating material was forwarded, the AO ought not to have assumed jurisdiction under s.147, and the failure to follow the due statutory route (including s.153C where applicable) vitiated initiation itself. Since confirmations had already been furnished during s.142(1) proceedings, rejection/forensic testing at appellate stage could not cure the foundational defect. Appeal allowed on jurisdiction, without examining merits. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
