Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Cancellation of GST registration under Section 29(2)(e) of the CGST/WBGST Act was set aside as the order lacked reasons, reflected non-application of mind, and violated natural justice. The notice of personal hearing was issued by one authority, but the impugned cancellation order was passed by another, breaching the settled rule that the authority who hears must decide. A post-decisional hearing was refused because it cannot cure an unreasoned, mindless final order. The matter was remanded with directions to grant a fresh hearing, consider the earlier reply to the show-cause notice, and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law - HC
Cancellation of GST registration under Section 29(2)(e) of the CGST/WBGST Act was set aside as the order lacked reasons, reflected non-application of mind, and violated natural justice. The notice of personal hearing was issued by one authority, but the impugned cancellation order was passed by another, breaching the settled rule that the authority who hears must decide. A post-decisional hearing was refused because it cannot cure an unreasoned, mindless final order. The matter was remanded with directions to grant a fresh hearing, consider the earlier reply to the show-cause notice, and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.