Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The dominant issue was classification of imported "MIKO-3" as "electronic toys" under CTH 95030030 versus an automatic data processing unit under CTH 84714190. Applying binding parity with an earlier decision on the same importer on an identical factual matrix, the Tribunal held that the Revenue's attempted reclassification could not be sustained. The Revenue also failed to discharge the burden of disproving the importer's declared classification or to adduce evidence establishing the product as "electronic toys" alone. Accordingly, classification under CTH 84714190 was upheld and the impugned orders were set aside, with the appeal allowed. - CESTAT
The dominant issue was classification of imported "MIKO-3" as "electronic toys" under CTH 95030030 versus an automatic data processing unit under CTH 84714190. Applying binding parity with an earlier decision on the same importer on an identical factual matrix, the Tribunal held that the Revenue's attempted reclassification could not be sustained. The Revenue also failed to discharge the burden of disproving the importer's declared classification or to adduce evidence establishing the product as "electronic toys" alone. Accordingly, classification under CTH 84714190 was upheld and the impugned orders were set aside, with the appeal allowed. - CESTAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.