Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In an appeal arising from oppression and mismanagement proceedings under Sections 241-242 of the Companies Act, 2013, involving allegations of undue gains and filing of false records/documents and a request to implement an equal shareholding pattern between two family groups, the tribunal accepted a post-dispute settlement placed on record through a memorandum. Consideration under the settlement was tendered through two demand drafts produced before the tribunal, with directions for controlled handover and acknowledgments. On that basis, the impugned order under challenge was substituted by the settlement terms, and the appeal was closed in terms of the memorandum of settlement. - NCLAT
In an appeal arising from oppression and mismanagement proceedings under Sections 241-242 of the Companies Act, 2013, involving allegations of undue gains and filing of false records/documents and a request to implement an equal shareholding pattern between two family groups, the tribunal accepted a post-dispute settlement placed on record through a memorandum. Consideration under the settlement was tendered through two demand drafts produced before the tribunal, with directions for controlled handover and acknowledgments. On that basis, the impugned order under challenge was substituted by the settlement terms, and the appeal was closed in terms of the memorandum of settlement. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.