Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The dominant issue was whether an assessment order passed pursuant to search-related proceedings could be sustained as being within limitation by invoking section 153(6)(i) of the Income-tax Act. The court held that, after the interim stay when only eleven days remained, limitation could at best stand extended by sixty days from the relevant Supreme Court decision date (or even from the date of its receipt by the assessing officer), which still rendered the order dated 30.04.2024 time-barred. It further held that section 153(6)(i) cannot be applied in isolation and, read with section 153, pertains to general assessments under sections 143/144, not section 153C search assessments with distinct statutory timelines. The assessment order was quashed and the writ petition was allowed. - HC
The dominant issue was whether an assessment order passed pursuant to search-related proceedings could be sustained as being within limitation by invoking section 153(6)(i) of the Income-tax Act. The court held that, after the interim stay when only eleven days remained, limitation could at best stand extended by sixty days from the relevant Supreme Court decision date (or even from the date of its receipt by the assessing officer), which still rendered the order dated 30.04.2024 time-barred. It further held that section 153(6)(i) cannot be applied in isolation and, read with section 153, pertains to general assessments under sections 143/144, not section 153C search assessments with distinct statutory timelines. The assessment order was quashed and the writ petition was allowed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.