Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Assessment relating to alleged excess/irregular ITC availment and consequential interest and late-fee liabilities was interfered with on the ground that the matter required reconsideration on merits after a proper reply and supporting documents. The impugned order was directed to be treated as an addendum to the show-cause notice, and the authority was mandated to pass a fresh final order in accordance with law after considering the taxpayer's reply. The remand was made conditional upon deposit of 50% of the disputed tax (in cash through the electronic cash ledger) within 30 days; upon such compliance, the bank-account attachment was to stand automatically vacated and the authority to decide expeditiously. - HC
Assessment relating to alleged excess/irregular ITC availment and consequential interest and late-fee liabilities was interfered with on the ground that the matter required reconsideration on merits after a proper reply and supporting documents. The impugned order was directed to be treated as an addendum to the show-cause notice, and the authority was mandated to pass a fresh final order in accordance with law after considering the taxpayer's reply. The remand was made conditional upon deposit of 50% of the disputed tax (in cash through the electronic cash ledger) within 30 days; upon such compliance, the bank-account attachment was to stand automatically vacated and the authority to decide expeditiously. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
