Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Indirect business expenditure comprising statutory audit fees,...
Business upkeep expenses despite no revenue, director's interest-free advances, and property gift additions-disallowances and notional interest deleted
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Indirect business expenditure comprising statutory audit fees, rent, rates and taxes, professional charges and property maintenance was held allowable under s.37(1) as necessary to maintain corporate existence and incurred wholly for business purposes despite no revenue in the year; the disallowance was rejected. Notional interest on interest-free advances to a director was deleted since the advances were old, funded from share capital/free reserves, no interest-bearing funds were used, and only real income is taxable; the addition was unsustainable. Protective addition relating to a property gift was set aside because the assessee had already made and accepted a substantive addition in the subsequent year, rendering protective assessment unwarranted; the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. - ITAT
Indirect business expenditure comprising statutory audit fees, rent, rates and taxes, professional charges and property maintenance was held allowable under s.37(1) as necessary to maintain corporate existence and incurred wholly for business purposes despite no revenue in the year; the disallowance was rejected. Notional interest on interest-free advances to a director was deleted since the advances were old, funded from share capital/free reserves, no interest-bearing funds were used, and only real income is taxable; the addition was unsustainable. Protective addition relating to a property gift was set aside because the assessee had already made and accepted a substantive addition in the subsequent year, rendering protective assessment unwarranted; the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.