Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents f...
Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Export Obligation Discharge Certificates for EPCG compliance cannot be questioned by Customs unless DGFT adjudicates and cancels them, so demands quas...
Indirect business expenditure comprising statutory audit fees,...
Business upkeep expenses despite no revenue, director's interest-free advances, and property gift additions-disallowances and notional interest deleted
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Indirect business expenditure comprising statutory audit fees, rent, rates and taxes, professional charges and property maintenance was held allowable under s.37(1) as necessary to maintain corporate existence and incurred wholly for business purposes despite no revenue in the year; the disallowance was rejected. Notional interest on interest-free advances to a director was deleted since the advances were old, funded from share capital/free reserves, no interest-bearing funds were used, and only real income is taxable; the addition was unsustainable. Protective addition relating to a property gift was set aside because the assessee had already made and accepted a substantive addition in the subsequent year, rendering protective assessment unwarranted; the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. - ITAT
Indirect business expenditure comprising statutory audit fees, rent, rates and taxes, professional charges and property maintenance was held allowable under s.37(1) as necessary to maintain corporate existence and incurred wholly for business purposes despite no revenue in the year; the disallowance was rejected. Notional interest on interest-free advances to a director was deleted since the advances were old, funded from share capital/free reserves, no interest-bearing funds were used, and only real income is taxable; the addition was unsustainable. Protective addition relating to a property gift was set aside because the assessee had already made and accepted a substantive addition in the subsequent year, rendering protective assessment unwarranted; the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.