Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
For applying s.56(2)(vii)(b), the proviso requires an agreement fixing consideration, identification of stamp duty value as on the agreement date, and part payment by a non-cash mode on or before that date. The allotment letter, containing agreed terms, identified the specific flat, fixed the consideration and payment schedule, and conferred exclusivity; it was enforceable as a valid contract under s.10 of the Contract Act, supported by part payment through banking channels. Accordingly, the stamp duty value as on the allotment date governed, and no taxable difference arose; the addition was deleted and the taxpayer's grounds were allowed. - ITAT
For applying s.56(2)(vii)(b), the proviso requires an agreement fixing consideration, identification of stamp duty value as on the agreement date, and part payment by a non-cash mode on or before that date. The allotment letter, containing agreed terms, identified the specific flat, fixed the consideration and payment schedule, and conferred exclusivity; it was enforceable as a valid contract under s.10 of the Contract Act, supported by part payment through banking channels. Accordingly, the stamp duty value as on the allotment date governed, and no taxable difference arose; the addition was deleted and the taxpayer's grounds were allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
