Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The dominant issue was whether an approved resolution plan could...
Insolvency resolution plan's loan assignment between approving and dissenting creditors: post-approval redistribution blocked; original distribution enforced, appeal dismissed.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The dominant issue was whether an approved resolution plan could be modified to reassign a loan component from approving financial creditors to dissenting financial creditors by treating dissenters as "other entity" under the plan. The plan's clauses expressly contemplated assignment of the loan and distribution of the balance resolution amount to approving financial creditors, including that loan, and any attempt to alter this post-approval would change the agreed distribution mechanism. Since Section 30(4) makes the CoC-approved plan binding and the CoC's commercial wisdom is confined to approval, it cannot be invoked later to justify impermissible modifications. The application seeking enforcement of the original plan was rightly allowed and the appeal challenging it was dismissed - NCLAT
The dominant issue was whether an approved resolution plan could be modified to reassign a loan component from approving financial creditors to dissenting financial creditors by treating dissenters as "other entity" under the plan. The plan's clauses expressly contemplated assignment of the loan and distribution of the balance resolution amount to approving financial creditors, including that loan, and any attempt to alter this post-approval would change the agreed distribution mechanism. Since Section 30(4) makes the CoC-approved plan binding and the CoC's commercial wisdom is confined to approval, it cannot be invoked later to justify impermissible modifications. The application seeking enforcement of the original plan was rightly allowed and the appeal challenging it was dismissed - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
