Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6781 to 6800 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Vicarious liability under Section 141 NI Act was examined where the accused director claimed to have resigned before dishonour of the cheques and sought quashing. The complaints contained basic averments that the accused was in charge of and responsible for the companies' business at the relevant time, and he was also the signatory to the cheques, attracting presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 NI Act. Applying the "unimpeachable and incontrovertible material" standard, the resignation and corporate filings were held insufficient to conclusively negate involvement; the accused's inconsistent stand and fact-intensive questions required trial. The request to interdict proceedings under Section 528 BNSS was rejected and the prosecution was allowed to continue. - HC
Vicarious liability under Section 141 NI Act was examined where the accused director claimed to have resigned before dishonour of the cheques and sought quashing. The complaints contained basic averments that the accused was in charge of and responsible for the companies' business at the relevant time, and he was also the signatory to the cheques, attracting presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 NI Act. Applying the "unimpeachable and incontrovertible material" standard, the resignation and corporate filings were held insufficient to conclusively negate involvement; the accused's inconsistent stand and fact-intensive questions required trial. The request to interdict proceedings under Section 528 BNSS was rejected and the prosecution was allowed to continue. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.